A passage comes back.
- Identity is reconstructed again.
- Old and current context compete.
- Evidence and status can drift apart.
Agentic memory that understands people
Within the verified closed-beta boundary, supported, authorized inputs can become canonical memory of people, organizations, commitments, relationships, and change—then qualified, cited context for the agent doing the work.
Evidence stays inspectable. Uncertainty stays visible. Memory never grants authority to act.
Why memory
The same person appears across sources and time. Useful context needs identity, state, and evidence—not just a similar fragment.
The memory model
Resolve recurring mentions without merging ambiguity by default.
Keep current, historical, and superseded state distinct.
Attach sources; label inference, conflict, and uncertainty.
Place roles, commitments, and connections with their entities.
Keep useful context separate from permission to act.
Bounded retrieval
Supported deployments may use the subject, integrating agent, permitted scope, and task to narrow already-published memory.
Claim boundary
Promoted people and other durable entities can retain qualified state through change.
Supported sources can produce published memory and bounded retrieval inside the verified beta boundary.
This is the GTM beta’s evaluation question, not a measured result.
Personal and organizational isolation and explicit sharing are being shaped—not offered as current behavior.
Closed beta
We are inviting GTM teams that can bring authorized source context to the closed beta.